*How Accurate Is Scientific Testing?*
What is meant by "peer reviewed"? What is so-called blind and double blind
testing and how accurate is it? Why do "scientists" refuse to even look at
anecdotal evidence?
*Peer Reviewed:* What this means is that persons just like the person who
wrote the report thought it was accurate. Doesn't this mean that those
peers are just as "educationally handicapped" as the person who wrote the
report. Or, is it merely a friend who thinks like you? There have been at
least 4 "peer reviewed" articles in various medical journals proving that
vitamin C is not useful against cold and flu viral infections. All of them
are false, yet believed by many, particularly the persons aimed at (Medical
Doctors).
From the books and studies that Medical Doctors have received in Med School,
they believe that 75 mg of vitamin C is a "good" Required Daily Allowance
(RDA). This is the best example I know of, for "educationally handicapped"
as a label for MD's.
Of all the animals, we primates lost one enzyme some 65 million years ago.
That particular enzyme was crucial as it is needed to transform blood sugar
(glucose) into ascorbic acid (vitamin C). Virtually all other animals
actually manufacture vitamin C *as needed*. It just so happens we do have a
good reliable "tested" RDA for a 150 pound primate - an ape whose need for
vitamin is the same as ours. WOW! That figure is 4000 mg. And that is
just an average. If that ape gets sick, it may be10 times that figure
Here's another fact. Virus and bacteria multiply in the blood by binary -
that is, they double about every 20 minutes. That means that in 200
minutes, the amount of virus cells can go from 1 to over 1000, and in
another 200 minutes to a million. Yes, billion and then trillion are next.
The "phony" Vitamin C reports were either only 1000mg (1 gram) or less.
That's per hour. By the time that symptoms are bad enough for notice by the
person, they are in the billions. This means that 1000 mg simply cannot kill
off even half of the virus cells.
For arguments sake, let's say that this amount does kill of half of the
invading cells. In 20 minutes, you're back to the original levels, and in
40 minutes, it's twice the original, and by the time the hour has passed,
you're up to double the original, and another 1 gram won't kill more than a
quarter. Binary is very fast multiplication.
I am totally against vaccines of any kind. Do you know what I do that stops
a cold or virus immediately? I take 4 grams of vitamin C every 15 minutes.
By the half hour or so, all symptoms are gone, and I often have to go no
further, but I then take one every 15 minutes to just "mop up" any hidden
survivors. Much cheaper and much less problem than any drugs.
All those "peer reviewed" studies were false because of the lack of
"correct" knowledge not taught in medical schools. Any MD"s who learn such
do so on their own, and it takes exceptional persons to do that.
* Blind and Double Blind testing: *This the "common" test where there is
an actual drug, and a "placebo" (sort of sugar pill harmless and ineffective
- supposedly).* *The placebo is the "control", and the drug is tested for
how effective it is as opposed to the "nothing" pill.*
*
In 1948, I met Joseph Banks Rhine at Duke, had dinner with he and his wife
and spent the night in his spare bedroom. (For those who don't know about
Joe, he invented the term Extra Sensory Perception. In 1932, his book "The
Mind of Man" created a furor. Psychologists called him a quack whose
mathematics were wrong. Mathematical PhD's claimed they didn't believe him
either, but his math was perfect. Joe actually started his testing of ESP
to debunk it, and wound up proving that it did exist and wasmuch more valid
that thought.
Joe and I had corresponded,as I had done a lot of research over a year or
more using his 'Rhine Cards"). All my testing of various subjects had
proven to me that hypnosis could increase ESP ability. Joe's testing in his
lab showed exactly the opposite. We argued (not fought) until 2 in the AM,
but couldn't find any way that either of us was either wrong or right.
Years later in writing my doctoral thesis, I decided to write it on
hypnosis, and in the course of my reading, I found several different tests
where one hypnotist got one answer and another got a different answer. That
is Professor A did test A, and got result A. Professor B did test A but got
result B. This led me to the answer.
Look at 2 very well proven postulates in hypnosis and ESP.
1. A hypnotized person has an almost "insane" desire to please the
hypnotist.
2. ESP does exist, and the unconscious mind knows much more than we do.
Now, if those two postulates are true and well proven, as they both are
albeit in differing sciences. Here are a few conclusions that can be seen.
1. At least some of the tested in blind and double blind know unconsciously
what the experimenter wants to prove, (and also which pill they got) and
they will strive to give him/her that result. I wanted to prove that ESP
was improved in some by hypnosis, yet Joe wanted to prove the opposite. We
both got what we wanted. (I was very sorry that he had died before I
figured that out as he would have been as delighted with it as I was.)
2. Now let's look at the opposite. Suppose that many of the persons
involved for some reason don't like the experimenter. Now, that gets wrong
results.
I do not believe that there is any such thing as "blind" or even "multiple
blind". Joe proved most of that years ago. Too bad his research has been
largely forgotten.
*Anecdotal Evidence: *This is anything that is not "proven" by the above
"scientific" research. In other words, just because there are a hundred
similar stories of how a certain "thing" cured someone of something, that's
not proven evidence.
I have to agree that one or even 2 cases aren't proof, but when the numbers
reach over 100, or even 10, that's evidence that should not be ignored. I
work within the limits of the unconscious mind, and there are many things
that cannot be measured and researched in that area. That does not mean
that they are false.
My Neuroliminal Training has definitely solved at least 4 known allergies
that were impacting my life. (The FDA forbids me to say the "cure" word -
how's that for nonsense? I have hundreds of anecdotes for the same allergy
experiences from many people. How can you test scientifically the
unconscious mind? No two are the same in the first place. I found out
that with Joe and I and our tests that proved conclusively that we were both
right, and both wrong at the same time.
Of course, I haven't even touched on the MD 'whores" that when paid by Big
Pharma falsify tests.
Do I trust any medical or drug testing at this time? Very little - now you
know my reasons.
---
---
From Dr Mercola
This Almost Perfect Food Gobbles Up Your Body's Toxins
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/15/40-common-conditions-this-simple-marine-veggie-can-ease.aspx?e_cid=20110724_SNL_MV_1
---
Worries About New Gonorrhea Superbug
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/28/worries-about-new-gonorrhea-superbug.aspx?e_cid=20110728_DNL_art_2
---
The Studies You Should Never, Ever Believe
http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2011/07/28/how-you-can-tell-if-they-are-lying-to-you-in-studies.aspx?e_cid=20110728_DNL_art_3
---
The "New" Hidden Pandemic Sweeping Across America
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/30/dr-thrasher-on-the-health-dangers-of-mold.aspx?e_cid=20110730_DNL_art_1
---
The Soap You Should Never Use - But 75% of Households Do
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/27/how-washing-your-hands-and-germophobia-can-damage-your-brain.aspx?e_cid=20110727_DNL_art_1
---
From Natural News:
up-to-date A-to-Z list of the worst ingredients you'll find in food.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033162_food_ingredients_chemicals.html
---
CAD mammography shown to be medically useless
http://www.naturalnews.com/033161_CAD_mammography_breast_cancer.html
---
Why are Monsanto and DuPont buying up all the seed companies? (and other
news)
http://www.naturalnews.com/033148_seed_companies_Monsanto.html
---
Peach pit kernels contain powerful anti-cancer medicine that few know about
http://www.naturalnews.com/033123_laetrile_vitamin_B17.html
---
Cholesterol drugs promote diabetes.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033109_cholesterol_drugs_diabetes.html
---
UK scientists secretly created 150 human/animal hybrid embryos known as
"cybrids" and "chimeras." They included animal eggs fertilized with human
sperm.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033100_human-animal_hybrids_Planet_of_the_Apes.html
---
From NewsMax Health:
A Medical Conspiracy?
http://hsionlineorders.net/video/HSI_7most_signup/?pco=LHSIM725&xco=XHSIM725&fco=LHSIM726
---
Beat Common Headaches
http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/dr_blaylock/beat_common_headaches/2011/07/21/399309.html?s=al&promo_code=CAB3-1
---
Doctors� Top 10 Anti-aging Tips Fight Effects of Time
http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/headline_health/Anti_Aging_Tips/2011/07/22/399496.html?s=al&promo_code=CAB1-1
---
From Gil Shepard (Int Psy)
Study of Medical Devices is attacked - unseen NYTIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/28/health/28institute.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha25
---
From Autism Florida
The Comic/Tragic Politics of the Autism/Asperger World:
Columbia University Lecture
http://www.grasp.org/videocolumbia.htm
---
From Alliance for Natural Health
http://www.anh-usa.org/the-wheels-come-off-the-bus-on-genetically-engineered-crops/
---
That's the digest for this week. The revision of the website "
www.drbate.com is nearly finished. There are now over 100 free articles to
help improve your health. These range from PMS to Schizophrenia to Cancer.
All of the old pages are now transformed into articles. One woman told me
that she spent over 2 hours and was going back for more. There's something
there that will help you, and most of it's free. NT CD's are the only thing
sold.
---
Phil Bate PhD - Inventor of NT Therapy
NT Solves ADD-Autism, Depression,
http://drbate.com - philbatephd@gmail.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
